In a recent incident at the US Capitol, Real America’s Voice correspondent Ben Bergquam found himself in a heated exchange with Capitol Police officers while exercising his First Amendment rights. The confrontation, captured on video and shared widely on social media, highlights the tensions surrounding media access and the interpretation of constitutional rights within the halls of power.
Bergquam, known for his conservative commentary and investigative reporting, was filming in the Capitol when he encountered a Capitol Police officer who appeared distressed and emotional and threatening. The officer, identifying Bergquam as media, expressed concerns about the safety of his actions, particularly his use of a phone to film representatives and engage in discussions about constitutional rights.
Throughout the encounter, Bergquam remained composed and articulate, asserting his right to film and question public officials in a public space. He engaged in a back-and-forth with the officer who appeared to be seething with anger and control issues, challenging the notion that his actions posed a threat or were inherently dangerous.
Bergquam’s calm demeanor contrasted sharply with the officer’s emotional state, further highlighting the power dynamics at play.
The incident had taken a dramatic turn when Bergquam spotted Representative Adam Schiff, a frequent target of his criticism, walking up the Capitol stairs.
Bergquam, seizing the opportunity, began questioning Schiff about his role in the Russia collusion investigation and the potential consequences for his actions. Schiff, seemingly aware of Bergquam’s presence, chose to walk up the stairs rather than engage with him directly.
The exchange between Bergquam and the officer happened immediately following the exchange between Schiff and Bergquam. The officer provided Bergquam with rules and regulations regarding media access and safety.
Bergquam, however, maintained his stance, arguing that his actions were protected under the First Amendment and that the officer’s interpretation of the situation was incorrect.
The incident serves as a microcosm of the broader debates surrounding media access, free speech, and the role of law enforcement in regulating these interactions.
The incident should remind us that the pursuit of truth and accountability can sometimes lead to emotionally charged confrontations. Still, free speech and the rule of law must be upheld, even in adversity.
Also, the same day, Bergquam reported seeing an increase in support for President Donald J. Trump and the America First movement, proving that the control freaks in the country are going to have their hands full trying to keep MAGA under control:
To support our journalism: