New Hampshire Cuts Ties with American Library Association: A Bold Statement or a Necessary Move?
New Hampshire has joined a growing list of states that have severed ties with the American Library Association (ALA). Governor Chris Sununu’s withdrawal of his state librarian nominee comes alongside the revelation that the New Hampshire State Library (NHSL) exited the ALA this year. The stated reason? The yearly dues weren’t worth the return. But some say there’s much more to the story.
A Letter That Sparked Action
Last February, State Representative and librarian Arlene Quaratiello wrote a letter to Sarah Stewart, Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. Co-signed by 100 state representatives, the letter pushed for the NHSL to cut all ties with the ALA. It criticized the ALA’s support of materials and events deemed inappropriate and its perceived political agenda.
Quaratiello’s letter questioned how books like Gender Queer, celebrated by the ALA, found their way into New Hampshire schools. She argued that the ALA promotes such works through awards and glowing reviews, framing them as inclusive and fair. The letter pointed out that the ALA’s leadership and publications have increasingly focused on equity, diversity, and social justice themes, which Quaratiello and others see as undermining parental authority.
Criticism of the ALA’s Leadership
The letter didn’t stop at the organization’s policies. It took aim at ALA President Emily Drabinski, a self-proclaimed Marxist. Drabinski’s comments at the Socialism 2023 conference about libraries being sites for socialist organizing drew significant backlash.
Even though Drabinski’s term is temporary, Quaratiello argued that the ALA’s agenda will persist due to its entrenched staff and long-standing political alliances. Notably, the letter called attention to the ALA’s historical connection with philanthropist George Soros, citing grants and awards as evidence of a broader political strategy.
Supporters vs. Critics
Supporters of the ALA highlight its services, discounts, and resources for libraries nationwide. They argue that membership helps libraries access valuable tools and professional development. However, Quaratiello dismissed these benefits as insufficient, asserting that taxpayer dollars shouldn’t fund what she called a “pernicious organization.”
A National Trend
New Hampshire is not alone. States like Texas, Florida, and Montana have also distanced themselves from the ALA. The move signals dissatisfaction with the organization’s influence and values. Quaratiello framed New Hampshire’s decision as part of a broader effort to send a strong message about defunding the ALA and encouraging local libraries to follow suit.
A Divided Response
The decision has sparked mixed reactions. Advocates of the withdrawal see it as a necessary stand against what they view as a political agenda infiltrating public institutions. Critics argue it’s an overreach that could limit access to diverse resources and undermine professional networks for librarians.
What’s Next?
As debates over library content and public funding continue, New Hampshire’s choice adds fuel to the national conversation. Whether this move sets a precedent or sparks backlash remains to be seen.