John Solomon Warns of Imminent Subpoenas as Investigators Examine Alleged “Business Plan” Behind Border Chaos and Political Lawfare
Investigative journalist John Solomon told Steve Bannon on Monday morning’s WarRoom that he would “not be surprised” if subpoenas are delivered as early as today or tomorrow as part of a widening investigation into what he describes as a coordinated “business plan” involving immigration policy, public funds, election strategy, and politically motivated prosecutions.
According to Solomon, congressional investigators and federal authorities are examining whether a sequence of government actions over several years were not random policy failures, but part of an organized effort that included open borders, the movement of illegal migrants into battleground states, the expansion of welfare access, and the alleged weaponization of criminal charges against political opponents tied to the Trump administration.
Solomon said the evidence he has seen points to a major development phase in the case, with grand jury activity underway and potential subpoenas targeting top Minnesota officials. While no formal charges have been announced, Solomon emphasized that investigators are now looking not only at interference with federal immigration enforcement, but also at whether systemic fraud and coordinated funding networks were essential to a broader political strategy.
Solomon Says Investigators See a Pattern, Not Isolated Events
During the interview, Solomon outlined what he described as a five step chain of events that multiple members of Congress are now treating as potentially connected.
First, he noted that the Trump administration’s effort to exclude illegal aliens from the census count was reversed. That change, Solomon explained, affected congressional apportionment and federal funding formulas.
Second, he said the border was effectively opened, while nonprofit organizations received government funds to move illegal migrants from the border into interior states, including battleground regions and large sanctuary cities.
Third, according to Solomon, those migrants were then allowed access to welfare systems, even though existing law generally restricts welfare eligibility for several years.
Fourth, he said that when fraud indicators began appearing, authorities allegedly turned a blind eye.
Finally, Solomon stated that investigators are now examining whether the cumulative effect of these actions served a coordinated political goal.
“What Comer and Rand Paul and several others are telling me,” Solomon said, “is they’re beginning to see evidence that this was a master plan.”
Solomon stressed that if evidence ultimately shows these actions were coordinated rather than coincidental, it would represent “one of the biggest stories of our lifetime.”
Grand Jury Activity and Possible Subpoenas
One of the most significant developments Solomon shared involved Minnesota.
He referenced recent reporting that officials, including Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, are under criminal investigation related to alleged obstruction of federal immigration enforcement activities. Solomon said the probe is broader than interference alone and includes questions about whether intentional inaction allowed fraud to flourish.
“There could be subpoenas delivered today or tomorrow, hand delivered to the governor and the mayor of Minneapolis,” Solomon said. “That is a big moment.”
He added that the Minnesota attorney general could also soon receive grand jury attention, citing the existence of whistleblowers and state workers who are reportedly cooperating with federal investigators.
Solomon further stated that, based on his reporting, investigators are also tracking who is funding protests, who may be orchestrating them, and whether organized financial networks are involved.
“It’s one thing to have the process and everything to deliver,” he said. “But the machine is rolling.”
Congress Already Investigating the Broader Framework
Solomon emphasized that congressional oversight is already active. Lawmakers, he said, are examining whether what the public has been told are isolated controversies may actually represent components of a unified strategy.
He explained that members of Congress are reviewing documents, timelines, funding trails, and policy decisions that stretch back years. According to Solomon, the inquiry is not limited to immigration enforcement, but extends into election law, public benefit systems, and the origins of politically charged prosecutions.
In previous reporting, Solomon has documented how large scale fraud investigations involving migrant benefit programs and nonprofit contractors have raised red flags for lawmakers. In a recent Just the News article, he detailed how Republicans are attempting to “unmask a blueprint” behind a growing Somali fraud scandal, describing it as potentially revealing how federal money, lax oversight, and political influence intersect. That reporting forms part of the factual backbone for the current investigation.
Solomon has consistently argued that the recurring pattern across agencies, states, and funding streams demands scrutiny beyond routine bureaucratic failure.
A Focus on Political Lawfare
Another element Solomon highlighted is the use of criminal charges and investigations against political figures associated with the Trump movement.
He told Bannon that part of what investigators are examining is whether false or politically driven criminal cases were used as a strategic weapon alongside immigration policy and funding mechanisms.
He framed this as a potential “business plan” model, where political pressure, demographic shifts, and legal action operate in tandem.
If proven, Solomon said, it would amount to a form of coordinated political warfare conducted through government systems rather than conventional campaigns.
What Happens Next
Solomon cautioned that investigations take time and that outcomes depend on evidence, not speculation. But he made clear that, in his view, the inquiry has moved into an active phase.
Grand juries, he said, are already operating. Witnesses are cooperating. Financial networks are being traced. Subpoenas may soon compel testimony and document production from high level officials.
He also suggested that arrests or indictments could potentially come as early as this month, though he stressed that timing ultimately rests with prosecutors and grand juries.
For now, Solomon urged the public to pay close attention to developments in Minnesota and in Congress, where investigators are assembling what he described as a comprehensive timeline of decisions, funding flows, and political actions.
Why Solomon’s Reporting Matters
For years, John Solomon has focused on document driven investigative reporting, often publishing underlying records alongside his stories. Supporters argue that his work fills a gap left by legacy media outlets reluctant to pursue politically sensitive investigations. His defenders also point to his track record of early reporting on issues that later became central to congressional and federal probes.
Whether the current investigation ultimately confirms or refutes the theory of a coordinated “business plan,” Solomon’s reporting has already pushed federal and state officials into the spotlight and forced formal scrutiny of systems that manage borders, benefits, and prosecutions.
As Solomon told Bannon, “All five of those things happened. And if they’re able to prove they were part of a master plan, it will be one of the largest reckonings in American history.”
For now, investigators are working. Subpoenas may be imminent. And according to Solomon, the machinery of accountability is already in motion.