VIEW GRABS: ‘Comedy is Legal Again!’ Barr Goes to X for a New Show

With all of the usurpations of American liberty and Freedom, it is so refreshing to be reminded of the good old days of America when people were free to enjoy comedy. Some people have not given up keeping their pro-Trump, pro-America messaging and have devised new ways to grab social media posters by the vews and give the American people something to listen to- other than the leftist tripe.

We know that X, the platform also known as Twitter, is a view grabber for Tucker Carlson:

But First.. please visit our Sponsors- help keep us online:

Check out this post and hear more about Roseanne Barr’s plans for view grabs:

The New York Post reported on the updates to Roseanne Barr’s MAGA career- recently:

Roseanne Barr — who was booted from her ABC show for a vile, racist, anti-Semitic tweetstorm — will team with an anti-woke retail company to launch a show on Elon Musk’s rebranded platform X, On The Money has learned.

Barr, 70, was signed to a six-figure deal by Publicsq, an online marketplace that counts Donald Trump Jr. as an advisor and investor and bills itself as Amazon for conservatives.

The company, which went public via SPAC last month, will be the exclusive sponsor for whatever comes out of the comedian’s often foul mouth when the show debuts this month.

It could involve a written monologue or sketch comedy, be at least a half hour long and air monthly, sources said. 

No matter the format, it is sure to be provocative — and just what the self-avowed free speech absolutist Musk is looking for as he seeks to bring more original content to the site formerly known as Twitter.

“We’re followers of Elon and it’s pretty evident to us that whatever we want goes,” Barr told On The Money. 

“It’s a great way for people to fight back against totalitarianism,” she added.

Check out some of her posts…

“My favorite current (there’s so many it changes hourly) liberal hypocritical talking point is
“you’re obsessed with charging Hunter Biden with crimes- he isn’t the president so why does it matter? Focus on the man in the White House if you have a problem”

— Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) August 2, 2023

Arrest Trump for not stopping three full seconds at a stop sign in 1994! — Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) July 31, 2023

Ann thinks that the media reporting the Steele Dossier as real and the Hunter Biden laptop as a conspiracy theory is a conspiracy theory you guys. How did she type this without choking On her Adam’s apple? — Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) July 30, 2023

Some guys have all the luck. And by luck I mean the DOJ, the FBI, China, the White House, CIA, the media, and pedo child trafficking satanists. Trump only has the support of Americans that aren’t batshit crazy. — Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) August 3, 2023

John- What chromosome combination makes a female and what chromosomes make a male? Which gender can get pregnant and which can not? Can your “pro science party guy” let my anti science self know? Us dumb hillbillies need you super smart people to let us know all the things.

— Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) August 4, 2023

Simon Ateba, a White House correspondent, wrote at length about one of the great success at X, Tucker Carlson, who has gotten massive views on his programing under Elon Musk:

It has been two months since


departed from


, and no one in cable news has managed to fill his big shoes. Even colleagues who may have been envious of his top ratings and secretly conspired against him have fallen far short. This is because he asks critical questions that the mainstream media has failed to ask. They simply echo what “experts” or “officials” tell them and convince themselves they are acting professionally. Ironically, the individual who asks the real questions is labeled a conspiracy theorist, while those who regurgitate propaganda are considered true journalists, despite the public’s inability to recall their names. Carlson emphasized how the international failures of


and other world leaders are pushing us closer to a perilous world, and potentially a nuclear war. By asking the real questions, some falsely claimed he was doing the bidding of Putin. Just imagine if Russia, the country with the largest number of nuclear warheads, were to fall into the hands of a warlord. Consider the level of instability in Europe, the proliferation of atomic weapons, and the collapse of Europe, accompanied by the loss of millions of lives.

Imagine the current on-air laughter from those hoping for a purported coup to succeed and how they will react when Europe and the world plunge into chaos. Consider even contemplating that if Putin were overthrown, the individual who succeeds him would be a better partner or end the war. The truth is, we don’t know. The new leader could be worse, seizing Ukraine and unleashing bombs in all directions, potentially triggering another global conflict.

Think about the alarm in the US after news broke a few days ago that China and Cuba are negotiating the establishment of a joint military training facility on the island, potentially resulting in the deployment of Chinese troops and other security operations a mere 100 miles off Florida’s coast. Ponder the assertion that having Chinese troops near the US border in Cuba is unacceptable, yet failing to comprehend why Russia, a nuclear power, opposes NATO troops and military equipment near its border in Ukraine, suggesting the inclusion of a neutral country between its territory and Europe.

Envision then allocating billions of dollars for a war that will ultimately not be won and will result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands, with the potential to escalate into a nuclear conflict, claiming the lives of millions, destabilizing Europe, and indirectly elevating China as the world’s most powerful nation. Certainly, nobody desires any form of invasion. As someone who has witnessed Africa being invaded and divided, with even the queen of England installing leaders on the continent to govern over Africans, imposing new languages, pillaging resources, and transferring them to London while claiming to be an extraordinary figure, I understand the complexities involved.

I don’t know the ultimate solution between Russia and Ukraine or even between China, Cuba, and the United States. However, it appears that there are better alternatives than war or a nuclear conflict. Perhaps having a neutral Cuba and a neutral Ukraine would be in the best interest of the United States and the world, or perhaps not. I could be mistaken, as I have been on numerous occasions. Nevertheless, to quote Tucker Carlson, a destabilized Russia will certainly not be in the interest of Europe and the United States, just as a destabilized United States with its vast nuclear arsenal will not serve anyone’s interests. May God help us.

Ben Bergquam's Updates

Sign up today to get updates from Ben from Frontline America and Real America's Voice. Ben writes every email personally. Don't miss out!

This will close in 0 seconds