In this monologue, Tucker Carlson discusses the reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and its implications for American citizens’ privacy and the integrity of the U.S. political system. He begins by pointing out that recent revelations have confirmed the use of federal intelligence agencies to spy on Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016, and similar efforts were made against him in 2020. These actions, he argues, are part of a broader effort to rig presidential elections and undermine democracy.
Carlson criticizes the Republican Party, particularly Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, for not doing enough to defend the Constitution and rein in these federal agencies. Instead, Johnson has been working to reauthorize the FISA, which allows the government to spy on foreigners without a warrant, but has been used to spy on American citizens as well. Carlson points out that this law has been abused in the past, citing his own experience where the NSA read his text messages and leaked the information to discredit him.
He also highlights the power dynamics at play, noting that government officials, including the Department of Justice, have lobbied members of Congress directly to support the reauthorization of FISA. He argues that this kind of pressure undermines the principles of democracy and the separation of powers.
Carlson criticizes Speaker Mike Johnson for prioritizing the reauthorization of FISA and continued funding for Ukraine, suggesting that these are not the top priorities of Republican voters or the American people as a whole. He questions whether the Republican Party is truly representing the interests of its constituents or simply mirroring the priorities of the Democratic Party.
In conclusion, Carlson calls on the public to scrutinize the actions of their elected representatives and to consider whether the Republican Party is genuinely committed to defending their rights and interests. He suggests that if the party continues to prioritize issues that do not align with the concerns of its base, voters may begin to question the utility of supporting it.
WATCH: